Latest News
The DIY disasters of corporate finance
By Susannah Adams, Milsted Langdon’s senior manager, corporate finance
The more experienced and knowledgeable you are, the more tempting it is to have a go at corporate finance deals yourself, but doing it yourself is not always a good idea.
Below are some common mishaps resulting from DIY corporate finance and reasons why appointing specialists – like the author of this article or my colleague David Fawcus, our consultant specialising in corporate finance – is always a safe and surprisingly cost-effective remedy.
Problem |
Cause |
When it happens |
Symptoms |
Remedy: use a CF specialist because… |
Expectation gap |
“Back of fag packet “valuations |
Offer stage |
Sceptical buyers, disappointed client |
CF specialists follow an orderly transaction process, including early setting of price expectations. |
No buyer appetite |
Ineffective marketing |
Early in marketing process |
No buyers, disappointed client |
CF specialists have extensive information databases and contacts within the corporate transaction world. |
Costly economies |
Inadequate, ineffective dissemination of information (“Just send out some accounts and a link to the website.”) |
During the marketing process |
Extra work created by responding to buyers’ different information demands |
CF specialists create a comprehensive, professional, perfectly pitched information memorandum suited to client’s size and budget. |
Excessive work in progress (WIP) |
Ineffective treatment of “no buyer appetite”
|
Later in marketing process |
No buyers, disappointed client, massive WIP |
Using a CF specialist on a shared fee basis can be much more cost-effective than doing it yourself – they do the work, you still receive a fee. |
Problem |
Cause |
When it happens |
Symptoms |
Remedy: use a CF specialist because… |
Under-recovered WIP |
Unsuitable billing process (“Let’s see how we get on.”) |
Even later in marketing process |
Having set a success fee, payable on completion, you’ve done a lot of work you haven’t been paid for and initial enthusiasm wanes. |
Orderly CF transaction process sets milestone achievements and agrees a fee at each stage. |
Crowded agenda |
Too many ongoing issues with one client |
Serious cases can result in dropped clangers |
Loss of perceived value in CF service as very basic compliance matters and transaction issues dealt with in same meeting/ correspondence |
Using a CF specialist keeps a distance between the two, making it easier to charge a premium fee for premium services. |
Unclear profile in the market |
Perception in the market as a jack-of-all-trades |
Partners’ meetings |
Lack of CF referrals from other external sources and reputation amongst fellow partners as seller of firm’s “jewels” |
Other professionals, including banks and solicitors, are more comfortable referring business to dedicated and well known CF experts. |
Dropped clanger |
Inexperience of common transaction pitfalls (see also Crowded agenda) |
Heads of terms/ |
Often occurs in contract negotiations, creating tension between buyer and seller |
CF specialists have extensive transaction experience (and the occasional battle scar). |
General practice (GP) bottleneck |
Pressure from transaction |
Transaction nearing completion |
Unhappy clients, lack of progress with GP portfolio |
CF specialists are transaction-focused. |
Stalled transaction |
Pressure from GP portfolio |
General practice compliance deadlines |
Inability to complete a transaction in January. |
CF specialists do not have these additional distractions. |
If you would like to discuss in more detail how we can work with you on corporate finance, please contact the Milsted Langdon team
| RELATED LINKS | |
![]() |
|
| MGI WORLDWIDE | |
![]() |
|
|

